John Deaton, a lawyer who supports XRP, experienced a phone hack on June 4th during a persistent cyberattack that lasted for multiple days.
CryptoLaw, the account established by the attorney representing more than 76,000 XRP $0.53 token holders in the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), reacted to the tweet posted by the hacker through the attorney’s account. CryptoLaw clarified that the tweets did not originate from Deaton but were instead the work of hackers, and prompt measures are being taken to address the issue.
The phone hack took place while Deaton was commemorating his birthday, with well-wishes pouring in from various members of the cryptocurrency community. The tweets posted by the hackers promoted a cryptocurrency token named LAW, which has an extremely low market cap. As an individual recognized for his unwavering stance against regulatory enforcement actions taken by American agencies, the attorney has gained prominence as a significant figure within the crypto community.
The spread of fraudulent information and misleading financial data in the cryptocurrency market represents a notable threat, as traders frequently depend on advice from prominent figures in the sector. Such conduct endangers the stability of the market and offers regulators further justification to approach the industry with care and vigilance.
Deaton demonstrated a proactive approach to communicating with his Twitter followers, employing his daughter Jordan Deaton’s Twitter account to inform individuals about the hack. Deaton urged the community to report the incident.
Several members of the XRP community reacted favorably to Deaton’s request and shared tweets to inform additional users about the matter. Osakar Arnarson, a Twitter user, posted a detailed guide, providing other users with instructions on how to report the compromised account. Numerous other users also responded, stating that they had reported the hack successfully.
Cointelegraph attempted to contact Jordan Deaton and CryptoLaw; however, no response was received by the time of publication.
